<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest news about FreeBSD/xorg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/</link>
	<description>(Mostly) Technical Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J-Dog</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-7232</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-7232</guid>
		<description>Firstly.. I would like to thank you for all your hard work.. it is much appreciated.

Second, I was wondering if you had fixed the inputproto problems which cause problems building xorg 7.2? I am trying to compile xorg 7.2 and it keeps failing on xf86-input-calcomp.... TS_Raw and TS_Scaled errors.... I can comment out offending lines to get xf86-input-calcomp to compile but other input ports fail to build as well... I believe this is related to the inputproto problems I have read about recently..

I am wondering how I can "downgrade" my inputproto package so it doesn't cause problems... or how to get around the inputproto build problems?

Thanks,
J-Dog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly.. I would like to thank you for all your hard work.. it is much appreciated.</p>
<p>Second, I was wondering if you had fixed the inputproto problems which cause problems building xorg 7.2? I am trying to compile xorg 7.2 and it keeps failing on xf86-input-calcomp&#8230;. TS_Raw and TS_Scaled errors&#8230;. I can comment out offending lines to get xf86-input-calcomp to compile but other input ports fail to build as well&#8230; I believe this is related to the inputproto problems I have read about recently..</p>
<p>I am wondering how I can &#8220;downgrade&#8221; my inputproto package so it doesn&#8217;t cause problems&#8230; or how to get around the inputproto build problems?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
J-Dog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XCB on FreeBSD: case closed!</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>XCB on FreeBSD: case closed!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, Florent, I&#8217;d like to ask you the favour to double check what you post on comments: you got at least one contact from a FreeBSD derivative project, okay not for X11, but you were :) And not always when tarballs are released by XOrg project they were already checked and fixed by Eric, like it happened for libxcb&#8217;s release candidates. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, Florent, I&#8217;d like to ask you the favour to double check what you post on comments: you got at least one contact from a FreeBSD derivative project, okay not for <span class="caps">X11</span>, but you were <img src='http://blog.xbsd.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> And not always when tarballs are released by XOrg project they were already checked and fixed by Eric, like it happened for libxcb&#8217;s release candidates. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florent Thoumie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Thoumie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Well, Eric Anholt is mainly working directly in the X.org/Freedesktop Git tree, so when new distfiles are released, it means that it pretty much compiles/works on FreeBSD without any patches (which is quite cool, cause I have no X knowledge myself). Dejan Lesjak and Eric started working slowly on modular xorg ports early this year IIRC. At that time, I proposed to give a hand for the boring work. Since then Dejan has been a bit absent and Eric focused on upstream development.

Fortunately some other committers (Joel Dahl mainly, but there might be some others, I kinda lost track) and contributors (there's some activity on #freebsd-gnome @ freenode and on freebsd-x11@ mailing list) have submitted updates and quite a lot of bug reports, so things finally moved a bit faster since late september.

I had no contact from any FreeBSD derivative project (&lt;strong&gt;Edit&lt;/strong&gt;: actually, Diego works on Gentoo/FreeBSD so that's not true :-)), not that I was waiting for it anyway. I guess their packaging system is quite different than ours (I really have no clue) so they will have a lot of work to do on their own once it's merged in the FreeBSD ports tree.

Anyway, the work is almost finished, and it's pretty cool to think that I'll make a few users happy with what I've been spending my time on these last few months.

FR: Merci pour les encouragements ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Eric Anholt is mainly working directly in the X.org/Freedesktop Git tree, so when new distfiles are released, it means that it pretty much compiles/works on FreeBSD without any patches (which is quite cool, cause I have no X knowledge myself). Dejan Lesjak and Eric started working slowly on modular xorg ports early this year <span class="caps">IIRC</span>. At that time, I proposed to give a hand for the boring work. Since then Dejan has been a bit absent and Eric focused on upstream development.</p>
<p>Fortunately some other committers (Joel Dahl mainly, but there might be some others, I kinda lost track) and contributors (there&#8217;s some activity on #freebsd-gnome @ freenode and on freebsd-x11@ mailing list) have submitted updates and quite a lot of bug reports, so things finally moved a bit faster since late september.</p>
<p>I had no contact from any FreeBSD derivative project (<strong>Edit</strong>: actually, Diego works on Gentoo/FreeBSD so that&#8217;s not true :-)), not that I was waiting for it anyway. I guess their packaging system is quite different than ours (I really have no clue) so they will have a lot of work to do on their own once it&#8217;s merged in the FreeBSD ports tree.</p>
<p>Anyway, the work is almost finished, and it&#8217;s pretty cool to think that I&#8217;ll make a few users happy with what I&#8217;ve been spending my time on these last few months.</p>
<p>FR: Merci pour les encouragements <img src='http://blog.xbsd.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>Hello Florent,

I just agree with Ulrich, when he points the importance of your work for the Freebsd community. I'm following your progress nearly since the beginning, and there's nothing to say but:  Good job ! Bravo ! 
I'm just wondering why there are so litte poeple involved intoo the modular X project; aren't other developpers of the OS, or perhaps the first concerned PC-bsd teams, 
interested by your work ?

Compte tenu de votre CV, et de votre nom, j'en déduis que vous êtes Français; aussi c'est en temps que compatriote (Strasbourg) que j'aimerais terminer ce petit mot d'encouragement en vous remerciant pour le travail formidable que vous faites, et en vous souhaitant beaucoup de courage pour la suite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Florent,</p>
<p>I just agree with Ulrich, when he points the importance of your work for the Freebsd community. I&#8217;m following your progress nearly since the beginning, and there&#8217;s nothing to say but:  Good job ! Bravo !<br />
I&#8217;m just wondering why there are so litte poeple involved intoo the modular X project; aren&#8217;t other developpers of the OS, or perhaps the first concerned PC-bsd teams,<br />
interested by your work ?</p>
<p>Compte tenu de votre CV, et de votre nom, j&#8217;en d&eacute;duis que vous &ecirc;tes Fran&ccedil;ais; aussi c&#8217;est en temps que compatriote (Strasbourg) que j&#8217;aimerais terminer ce petit mot d&#8217;encouragement en vous remerciant pour le travail formidable que vous faites, et en vous souhaitant beaucoup de courage pour la suite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florent Thoumie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Thoumie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your support.

Most problems were ports problems (those are fixed).

The issue with libxcb is being or has been discussed on xcb mailing list, it will be fixed in the next release (or so I hope), but it's not critical at the moment as I've removed the xcb dependency for libX11.

The input drivers / xorg-server problems will be fixed soon. I'm currently downgrading some ports to match 7.2-RC2 (and then 7.2 when it's released) making sure that everything compiles fine (see x11@ archives for more information).

Hopefully, I'll meet the deadline I fixed myself, which is to have a ready-to-be-tested-on-pointyhat xorg-modular patch by the end of the month.

Most of the issues I know of have been fixed (mostly ports depending on devel/imake-6)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your support.</p>
<p>Most problems were ports problems (those are fixed).</p>
<p>The issue with libxcb is being or has been discussed on xcb mailing list, it will be fixed in the next release (or so I hope), but it&#8217;s not critical at the moment as I&#8217;ve removed the xcb dependency for libX11.</p>
<p>The input drivers / xorg-server problems will be fixed soon. I&#8217;m currently downgrading some ports to match 7.2-RC2 (and then 7.2 when it&#8217;s released) making sure that everything compiles fine (see x11@ archives for more information).</p>
<p>Hopefully, I&#8217;ll meet the deadline I fixed myself, which is to have a ready-to-be-tested-on-pointyhat xorg-modular patch by the end of the month.</p>
<p>Most of the issues I know of have been fixed (mostly ports depending on devel/imake-6)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulrich Spoerlein</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulrich Spoerlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>Hi Florent,

I just want to tell you how much your work on X for FreeBSD is appreciated. I dare say, it is *the* application most FreeBSD Users rely on in some form or the other.

You mentioned lots of problems, where do you see these problems coming from? Linux-centric code? The build system? FreeBSD itself?

Thanks again for your work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Florent,</p>
<p>I just want to tell you how much your work on X for FreeBSD is appreciated. I dare say, it is <strong>the</strong> application most FreeBSD Users rely on in some form or the other.</p>
<p>You mentioned lots of problems, where do you see these problems coming from? Linux-centric code? The build system? FreeBSD itself?</p>
<p>Thanks again for your work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florent Thoumie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Thoumie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>I have a patch that makes it compile fine but there is a failing test in parse_display_negative. Not sure why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a patch that makes it compile fine but there is a failing test in parse_display_negative. Not sure why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Flameeyes Pettenò</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/comment-page-1/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Flameeyes Pettenò</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/11/21/latest-news-about-freebsdxorg/#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>For libxcb, I've prepared a patch that adds the needed pthread stubs, and it's currently lingering on the xcb mailing list.
A part from that, XCB seems to work fine on (Gentoo/)FreeBSD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For libxcb, I&#8217;ve prepared a patch that adds the needed pthread stubs, and it&#8217;s currently lingering on the xcb mailing list.<br />
A part from that, <span class="caps">XCB</span> seems to work fine on (Gentoo/)FreeBSD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
