Comments on: CFT: Hoststated port – Host status daemon for server load-balancing http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing Geek stuff follows Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:30:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Florent Thoumie http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/comment-page-1#comment-8872 Florent Thoumie Thu, 17 May 2007 10:31:28 +0000 http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/#comment-8872 Haven't had the time to work on it lately. The code is moving fast and I think it's now using some OpenBSD-specific features. I'll try to have a look once X.org is merged. Haven’t had the time to work on it lately. The code is moving fast and I think it’s now using some OpenBSD-specific features.

I’ll try to have a look once X.org is merged.

]]> By: Joel Robison http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/comment-page-1#comment-8356 Joel Robison Tue, 01 May 2007 22:59:49 +0000 http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/#comment-8356 Has there been any progress on this? I have downloaded the source package from: http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/ports/hoststated/ and I have not any any luck compiling it. The Makefile I have looks for event-1.2 but currently libevent1.3 is in the source tree. Please advise. I am VERY interested in this, and I will do all I can to assist! -Joel Robison Has there been any progress on this? I have downloaded the source package from: http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/ports/hoststated/ and I have not any any luck compiling it. The Makefile I have looks for event-1.2 but currently libevent1.3 is in the source tree. Please advise. I am VERY interested in this, and I will do all I can to assist!

-Joel Robison

]]> By: Michael Smith http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/comment-page-1#comment-6948 Michael Smith Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:32:12 +0000 http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/#comment-6948 We've got this installed and running, but hoststated doesn't seem to be modifying the pf tables as expected. The correct host state shows up in hoststatectl but the table remains unchanged when viewed with a pfctl -T show -t . I can post config snippets and output if needed. Mike We’ve got this installed and running, but hoststated doesn’t seem to be modifying the pf tables as expected. The correct host state shows up in hoststatectl but the table remains unchanged when viewed with a pfctl -T show -t .

I can post config snippets and output if needed.

Mike

]]> By: Florent Thoumie http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/comment-page-1#comment-3071 Florent Thoumie Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:23:46 +0000 http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/#comment-3071 Been talking about it with mlaier, and he told me there was no real gain in having it in src rather than in ports (which is right). Been talking about it with mlaier, and he told me there was no real gain in having it in src rather than in ports (which is right).

]]> By: Dave Grochowski http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/comment-page-1#comment-3070 Dave Grochowski Thu, 08 Feb 2007 21:16:32 +0000 http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/08/cft-hoststated-port-host-status-daemon-for-server-load-balancing/#comment-3070 Any reason why you aren't considering this for inclusion in the base system? Any reason why you aren’t considering this for inclusion in the base system?

]]>