<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X.org 7.2 has been released, but not in ports yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet</link>
	<description>Geek stuff follows</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florent Thoumie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/comment-page-1#comment-3572</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Thoumie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/#comment-3572</guid>
		<description>Trying to answer everybody at the same time:

x nvidia-driver is currently broken with X.org 7.2 (cause it doesn&#039;t install files at the right place), this is a known issue that will be fixed soon.
x I haven&#039;t noticed any issue with the CFLAGS used when compiling nvidia-driver, if they&#039;re indeed wrong, then you should notify the maintainer of the port (ie. not me)
x when we&#039;ll do the PREFIX merge, we&#039;ll also bump PORTREVISION for all ports installing files in /usr/X11R6, so when you&#039;ll be done upgrading all your ports, there shouldn&#039;t be any of them left in /usr/X11R6, which we know won&#039;t be the case. You&#039;ll have to check that there are no *files* left in /usr/X11R6, move them to /usr/local and it could be a good idea to create a symlink from /usr/X11R6 to /usr/local.
x Yes, X.org 6.9 is going away, so if X.org 7.2 doesn&#039;t work for you, report problems upstream ASAP.
x I don&#039;t know about xdm issues cause I use gdm, but that doesn&#039;t sound like a major issue to me, the font-alias problem should be fixed for quite some time now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to answer everybody at the same time:</p>
<p>x nvidia-driver is currently broken with X.org 7.2 (cause it doesn&#8217;t install files at the right place), this is a known issue that will be fixed soon.<br />
x I haven&#8217;t noticed any issue with the <span class="caps">CFLAGS</span> used when compiling nvidia-driver, if they&#8217;re indeed wrong, then you should notify the maintainer of the port (ie. not me)<br />
x when we&#8217;ll do the <span class="caps">PREFIX</span> merge, we&#8217;ll also bump <span class="caps">PORTREVISION</span> for all ports installing files in /usr/X11R6, so when you&#8217;ll be done upgrading all your ports, there shouldn&#8217;t be any of them left in /usr/X11R6, which we know won&#8217;t be the case. You&#8217;ll have to check that there are no <strong>files</strong> left in /usr/X11R6, move them to /usr/local and it could be a good idea to create a symlink from /usr/X11R6 to /usr/local.<br />
x Yes, X.org 6.9 is going away, so if X.org 7.2 doesn&#8217;t work for you, report problems upstream <span class="caps">ASAP</span>.<br />
x I don&#8217;t know about xdm issues cause I use gdm, but that doesn&#8217;t sound like a major issue to me, the font-alias problem should be fixed for quite some time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gergely Czuczy</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/comment-page-1#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>Gergely Czuczy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>hi there,

at january i&#039;ve checked out the ModularXorg on my desktop, as it was described in the wikitest.freebsd.org page.
my experience was that it&#039;s damn unstable. the building was done, there was no trouble with that. the trouble had started after trying to make it work... trouble.. it was a nightmare.
1) there was some troubles with fonts, fonts.cache/.dir/etc wasn&#039;t installed properly and some default alias was missing
2) xdm didn&#039;t work. i could log on, and that&#039;s all.
3) if there was a backgrounding (etc ``gaim &amp;&#039;&#039;) in my ~/.xsession or in my ~/.fluxbox/startup, then xorg crashed.

i sent an email with the proper description of these to the proper mailing list, but i&#039;ve got no replies.

the question is, will we get an unstable new shit by xorg 7.2 isntead of this good, old, legacy, working old crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there,</p>
<p>at january i&#8217;ve checked out the ModularXorg on my desktop, as it was described in the wikitest.freebsd.org page.<br />
my experience was that it&#8217;s damn unstable. the building was done, there was no trouble with that. the trouble had started after trying to make it work&#8230; trouble.. it was a nightmare.<br />
1) there was some troubles with fonts, fonts.cache/.dir/etc wasn&#8217;t installed properly and some default alias was missing<br />
2) xdm didn&#8217;t work. i could log on, and that&#8217;s all.<br />
3) if there was a backgrounding (etc ``gaim &amp;&#8217;&#8216;) in my ~/.xsession or in my ~/.fluxbox/startup, then xorg crashed.</p>
<p>i sent an email with the proper description of these to the proper mailing list, but i&#8217;ve got no replies.</p>
<p>the question is, will we get an unstable new shit by xorg 7.2 isntead of this good, old, legacy, working old crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/comment-page-1#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 03:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>Enjoy France!  Thanks for all the hard work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy France!  Thanks for all the hard work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Sparrevohn</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/comment-page-1#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Sparrevohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>I just looked at the nvidia-driver - seems unclear which GL X links against. but even worse the nvidia-driver compiles using standard not kmod flags - which give weird results if one uses different optimisation on the base system (e.g. SSE/MMX etc)

I submit a patch soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked at the nvidia-driver &#8211; seems unclear which <span class="caps">GL X</span> links against. but even worse the nvidia-driver compiles using standard not kmod flags &#8211; which give weird results if one uses different optimisation on the base system (e.g. <span class="caps">SSE</span>/MMX etc)</p>
<p>I submit a patch soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demonix</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/comment-page-1#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>Demonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>I had to also change the path in x11/lib/Makefile to lib/xorg/modules/

Using 7.2RC 3_4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to also change the path in x11/lib/Makefile to lib/xorg/modules/</p>
<p>Using 7.2RC 3_4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo Perez</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/comment-page-1#comment-3404</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2007/02/16/xorg-72-has-been-released-but-not-in-ports-yet/#comment-3404</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I&#039;ve been able to install xorg and beryl in a fresh box without X. I found some problems during the installation. 
  Have to say that the box has a Geforce card (not so new not so old, but unfortunately not supported with the latest release of nvidia drivers, I think it&#039;s a Ge4) and the drivers tried to install in the wrong place. Have to change two files : 

        x11/driver/Makefile
        x11/extensions/Makefile

   changing DRIVERDIR to ${X11BASE}/lib/xorg/modules/drivers and LIBDIR to ${X11BASE}/lib/xorg/modules/extensions. In posting that here &#039;cause I don&#039;t know where to report the problem (I think freebsd pr wouldn&#039;t be the right thing to do, &#039;cause xorg 7.2 isn&#039;t in the port tree). I did all the process without NVIDIA_GL in the /etc/make.conf file. After that I removed libGL and installed nvidia-driver.

   I think I had problems with libdrm but sure you&#039;re aware of it as I found it reported around. 

   I&#039;m dumping (literally) the filesystems of my laptop to dvd so I&#039;ll try the process again. If I find something strange I&#039;ll try to fix it and report.

   One question is, what will happend after changing X11BASE to LOCALBASE ? I mean, what will be the process of migration for installations with X11BASE pointing to /usr/X11R6 ?

   Greets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been able to install xorg and beryl in a fresh box without X. I found some problems during the installation.</p>
<p>  Have to say that the box has a Geforce card (not so new not so old, but unfortunately not supported with the latest release of nvidia drivers, I think it&#8217;s a Ge4) and the drivers tried to install in the wrong place. Have to change two files :</p>
<p>        x11/driver/Makefile<br />
        x11/extensions/Makefile</p>
<p>   changing <span class="caps">DRIVERDIR</span> to ${X11BASE}/lib/xorg/modules/drivers and <span class="caps">LIBDIR</span> to ${X11BASE}/lib/xorg/modules/extensions. In posting that here &#8216;cause I don&#8217;t know where to report the problem (I think freebsd pr wouldn&#8217;t be the right thing to do, &#8216;cause xorg 7.2 isn&#8217;t in the port tree). I did all the process without <span class="caps">NVIDIA</span>_GL in the /etc/make.conf file. After that I removed libGL and installed nvidia-driver.</p>
<p>   I think I had problems with libdrm but sure you&#8217;re aware of it as I found it reported around.</p>
<p>   I&#8217;m dumping (literally) the filesystems of my laptop to dvd so I&#8217;ll try the process again. If I find something strange I&#8217;ll try to fix it and report.</p>
<p>   One question is, what will happend after changing <span class="caps">X11BASE</span> to <span class="caps">LOCALBASE </span>? I mean, what will be the process of migration for installations with <span class="caps">X11BASE</span> pointing to /usr/X11R6 ?</p>
<p>   Greets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

