<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Florent Thoumie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xbsd.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xbsd.org</link>
	<description>(Mostly) Technical Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Bla bla bla, *plaign*, bla bla bla&#8230; by Guestman</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/07/22/bla-bla-bla-plaign-bla-bla-bla/#comment-33398</link>
		<dc:creator>Guestman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/?p=125#comment-33398</guid>
		<description>&#62; "it’s about lack of manpower."

OK, if you want... but I'm sorry, I have perhaps not followed the whole story but the Firefox 'thing' remains something incredible and something that should not happen in an OS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;it&rsquo;s about lack of manpower.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, if you want&#8230; but I&#8217;m sorry, I have perhaps not followed the whole story but the Firefox &#8216;thing&#8217; remains something incredible and something that should not happen in an OS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bla bla bla, *plaign*, bla bla bla&#8230; by Florent Thoumie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/07/22/bla-bla-bla-plaign-bla-bla-bla/#comment-33359</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Thoumie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/?p=125#comment-33359</guid>
		<description>It is not a design issue, it's a decision that has been made not to support multiple branches for ports. It's not a matter of being lazy or anything, it's about lack of manpower.

I have tried to explain things nicely but he won't listen. He obviously knows better. He's getting high on slagging the opensource community (not even trying to make it better), so I don't think it's unfair of me writing a short comment once in a while (actually working on something).

I am going to unsubscribe from his blog anyway. There used to be some interesting posts once in a while, now it's just utter bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not a design issue, it&#8217;s a decision that has been made not to support multiple branches for ports. It&#8217;s not a matter of being lazy or anything, it&#8217;s about lack of manpower.</p>
<p>I have tried to explain things nicely but he won&#8217;t listen. He obviously knows better. He&#8217;s getting high on slagging the opensource community (not even trying to make it better), so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s unfair of me writing a short comment once in a while (actually working on something).</p>
<p>I am going to unsubscribe from his blog anyway. There used to be some interesting posts once in a while, now it&#8217;s just utter bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bla bla bla, *plaign*, bla bla bla&#8230; by Guestman</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/07/22/bla-bla-bla-plaign-bla-bla-bla/#comment-33344</link>
		<dc:creator>Guestman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/?p=125#comment-33344</guid>
		<description>&#62; "you would have admitted that your understanding of how ports and packages work was wrong"

Maybe yes, but in this case the ports system has a real problem in its design...

I don't defend Beranger but you should avoid permanent aggressiveness, it does not give a good image of people from FreeBSD, maybe even of the BSD world as a whole...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;you would have admitted that your understanding of how ports and packages work was wrong&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe yes, but in this case the ports system has a real problem in its design&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t defend Beranger but you should avoid permanent aggressiveness, it does not give a good image of people from FreeBSD, maybe even of the <span class="caps">BSD</span> world as a whole&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bla bla bla, *plaign*, bla bla bla&#8230; by Ceri Davies</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/07/22/bla-bla-bla-plaign-bla-bla-bla/#comment-33123</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceri Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/?p=125#comment-33123</guid>
		<description>I am annoyed that you linked to that; I spent far too long reading that page even after concluding that he knows nothing about Solaris (or pens, apparently) either.  If he produces that amount of crap every week, I suggest you just unsubscribe and forget he exists too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am annoyed that you linked to that; I spent far too long reading that page even after concluding that he knows nothing about Solaris (or pens, apparently) either.  If he produces that amount of crap every week, I suggest you just unsubscribe and forget he exists too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bla bla bla, *plaign*, bla bla bla&#8230; by the calling</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/07/22/bla-bla-bla-plaign-bla-bla-bla/#comment-32433</link>
		<dc:creator>the calling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/?p=125#comment-32433</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Florent Thoumie: Bla bla bla, *plaign*, bla bla bl......&lt;/strong&gt;

Bookmarked your post over at Blog Bookmarker.com!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Florent Thoumie: Bla bla bla, </strong><strong>plaign</strong>, bla bla bl&#8230;...</p>
<p>Bookmarked your post over at Blog Bookmarker.com!...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Permanent TSB Open24 Online Banking by Florent Thoumie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/09/21/permanent-tsb-open24-online-banking/#comment-31882</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Thoumie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/09/21/permanent-tsb-open24-online-banking/#comment-31882</guid>
		<description>Link fixed, thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link fixed, thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Permanent TSB Open24 Online Banking by Rory Browne</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/09/21/permanent-tsb-open24-online-banking/#comment-31664</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2006/09/21/permanent-tsb-open24-online-banking/#comment-31664</guid>
		<description>Do you still have the script? 

I'm interested in something like, that, but the link is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you still have the script?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in something like, that, but the link is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goodbye XFree86-4 by Trev</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/03/08/goodbye-xfree86-4/#comment-22428</link>
		<dc:creator>Trev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/03/08/goodbye-xfree86-4/#comment-22428</guid>
		<description>Arghhh - I switched to Xorg but it hard locks up my FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0 amd64 computers if I use the nv driver. I've tried several Nvidia cards - AGP 5200, 5500, 6200 and PCI MX4000. Of course the only other usable driver vesa does not support my LCD at 1680x1050 :(

XFree86 was rock solid ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arghhh &#8211; I switched to Xorg but it hard locks up my FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0 amd64 computers if I use the nv driver. I&#8217;ve tried several Nvidia cards &#8211; <span class="caps">AGP 5200</span>, 5500, 6200 and <span class="caps">PCI MX4000</span>. Of course the only other usable driver vesa does not support my <span class="caps">LCD</span> at 1680&#215;1050 <img src='http://blog.xbsd.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>XFree86 was rock solid &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Planet FreeBSD in testing by Florent Thoumie</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/01/22/new-planet-freebsd-in-testing/#comment-20411</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent Thoumie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/01/22/new-planet-freebsd-in-testing/#comment-20411</guid>
		<description>There are at least two features I'd like to see in feedjack: posts filtering and moderation. I reckon I could add the former in a quick and dirty way but the latter will take more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are at least two features I&#8217;d like to see in feedjack: posts filtering and moderation. I reckon I could add the former in a quick and dirty way but the latter will take more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Planet FreeBSD in testing by Dan Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/01/22/new-planet-freebsd-in-testing/#comment-20410</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.xbsd.org/2008/01/22/new-planet-freebsd-in-testing/#comment-20410</guid>
		<description>I hadn't heard of feedjack before.  The new planet looks great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of feedjack before.  The new planet looks great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
